Going back to the Fundmentals of the Gospel of Grace

       Today I have been thinking about Gods goodness to us although we have been unfaithful. As Church leaders we have abdicated our mandate as recorded in Ephesians 4:11-16 where the Apostle Paul wrote that;  11 It was he who gave some to be apostles, some to be prophets, some to be evangelists, and some to be pastors and teachers,  Most church leaders have fashioned for themselves statuses like the Hindu caste system where people are treated as their class dictates. Some have called themselves Apostles. If they are addressed and the title Apostle so and so is not included, they get offended. The question is; Does the word apostle mean a title, an office or a calling.  the Greek word from which the word Apostle is derived apostolos (ἀπόστολος, ου, ὁ) is a Noun, Masculine meaning ; a messenger, an envoy, a delegate, one commissioned by another to represent him in some way. Originally this referred to the men sent out by Jesus Christ Himself to preach the Gospel. So, the only people befitting to be called apostles without fear of any contradiction are the twelve disciples of Jesus. Their number remained to be 12 because after the death and departure of Judas Iscariot, Mathias was elected to replace him Acts 1:12-26.  Apart from these twelve, no one should ever claim to be an apostle and the word does not even mean a title or office.
       One may ask; if the word apostle refers only to the twelve, why does Paul call himself an apostle? To answer this question, we will have to look at the meaning given above;one commissioned by another to represent him in some way. Originally this refereed to the men sent out by Jesus Christ Himself to preach the Gospel.  In our case here, Paul was commissioned by Christ Himself on his way to Damascus thus: Acts 9:5
Then the Lord said, “I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting.^[a] It is hard for you to kick against the goads.”
⁶ So he, trembling and astonished, said, “Lord, what do You want me to do?”
Then the Lord said to him, “Arise and go into the city, and you will be told what you must do.”  And from here Saul became Paul and was sent to the Gentiles while the twelve were sent to the children of Israel. God is a God of order and a master strategic planner who planned all these before the creation of the earth and all that is in it. It is my sincere belief that at the moment, we have neither Apostles nor Prophets because the work of these two is perfectly done, completed and embodied in the scriptures. If we want to know and hear from them, we just go to the Bible. 
        Now back to the fundamentals, the work of pastors, teachers and evangelists, is in Ephesians 4: 12-14 to prepare God's people for works of service, so that the body of Christ may be built up until we all reach unity in the faith and in the knowledge of the Son of God and become mature, attaining to the whole measure of the fullness of Christ.  None of us is doing this. We may be busy organizing annual conferences and seminars in big five star hotels or even at universities in many parts of the world. But the sinners who Christ died for, are not found in hotels but here ;

 

        At the moment many pastors are keeping quiet and there is none of us who can speak to our political leaders and tell them what the Lord is saying. In fact many pastor in Eldoret and other cities are playing partisan politics. In last few weeks Christiano leaders in Eldoret asked members of their flock to demonstrate "peacefully" and "pray against the Tsunami" . Indeed many faithful members went and did this. WE HAVE ALL BECOME LIKE THE POLITICIANS BECAUSE WE HAVE EVEN STARTED PRAYING IN THEIR STYLE. We do not ask ourselves what the cause of disunity is instead we assume that a certain group is wrong and the other is right. Among the members of the flock we have people who are members of the opposition and our prayers can stop them from thinking otherwise. If you keenly listen to the so called the Bottom line by KTN( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTNQC_LYb2s) you will here most people speaking with bitterness and there is no sign of reconciliation.

      Another mandate given to the pastors and church leaders is to teach and preach the whole gospel of Christ so that the flock will grow and in Paul's words;  Then we will no longer be infants, tossed back and forth by the waves, and blown here and there by every wind of teaching and by the cunning and craftiness of men in their deceitful scheming.  We all are in a blame game, blaming politicians, politicians blaming the common citizens for making "wrong" choices and the Government blaming the opposition and the west for all the problems affecting our country. We have forgotten what the Apostle Paul said in Ephesians that only if we speak the truth in love, shall we grow up to maturity. I am sure most of our youths are easily beguiled by false teachers of religion who take them captive by teaching them false religion that tells them to kill because it is a religious duty. Those taking part in Terror groups like the Al shabaab are not true Muslims but disgruntled youth who do not have jobs and are misled. Paul admonishes us saying;  

15 Instead, speaking the truth in love, we will in all things grow up into him who is the Head, that is, Christ. 16 From him the whole body, joined and held together by every supporting ligament, grows and builds itself up in love, as each part does its work.
         Unfortunately, the church has left its responsibility of preaching the gospel of Jesus Christ and the ministers are instead building Kingdoms here on earth. Go to every city in Kenya and take a sample of where pastors live, where they belong as club members, who they associate with and where they shop. You will understand what I am talking about. In very few churches shall we find the gospel being preached because everybody holding a bible and can read and speak some English and Kiswahili is a pastor.  We should go back to the fundamentals of the gospel of Grace. Let us not build Kingdoms here but build the body of Jesus Christ for that is our duty and calling. Not buying big cars and building cathedrals and holding conferneces in hotels. When Christ Shall come, shall He find Faith?

Is it sin for girls to shave their hair in school?.

       I believe that the Bible teaches us to obey authority and schools have their own rules which are not against the teaching of the Bible. First, it is usual according to many of African cultures to keep our hair short clean. Girls among the Maasai, Kuria, Luhya, Abagusii, Agikuyu and even the Miji Kenda, keep short hair. So we are first Africans then religion comes in. So it is wise for these parents to understand that African beauty included short hair for girls- look at Lupita Nyongo and even the Late Miriam Makeba.


       Secondly, anybody who has been in the Kenya school system understands that it is not easy to take care of hair while in school. Students need at least 30-45 minutes to clean and comb their hair. So a girl would take approximately 1:30 minutes to prepare every morning. While she would be doing all these girls with short hair take only 15 minutes to prepare and start the morning prep. I have taught in girls schools and I have seen this many a time. 
        Thirdly, what the Apostle Paul is speaking about here, is about the believers' faith and practice in worship and the passage specifically concerns married women and their husbands. Our girls in schools are not married. The Greek word used in I Cor 11:13-23 is gunaikos which means woman as in a married woman. The word Korë is what would refer to a girl or maiden. Therefore we can conclude that long hair is a sign of beauty for the married women's husbands not for everybody. That is why they were required to cover their heads.So when we look at the Pictures below which would be considered to be siutable signs of humilty in worship?


      

        Fourthly if a woman has no hair on her head then it was a 'shame' but not a sin and this was according to the prevailing culture of the Corinthians. So shaving of hair is not sin. Among the African communities, shaving hair signified morning or undergoing some rite of passage. Those cultures that practice circumcision, require the young boys to shave their hair before graduating and on the day they come out of seclusion  they are deemed smart if they have clean heads. So the parents should interpret our culture in the light of scripture. It is not sin for girls to shave their hair neither is it compromising the gospel.

Leadership Training at Wareng High school Kenya.

The video here was part of the experimentation of the MODEL FOR THE INTEGRATION OF LANGUAGE & LEADERSHIP LEARNING STRATEGIES THROUGH TEXTUAL MATERIALS AND AUDIO-VISUAL MEDIA FOR COMMUNICATIVE COMPETENCY AND TRANSFORMATIONAL SERVANT LEADERSHIP FOR STUDENTS IN SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN KENYA. This is my dissertation and was assisted by pastor Elly Kigunyi who was working with Scripture Union of Kenya. Please pray for us so that we shall roll this programme in the whole of Kenya to see a change in our schools.

 Many trainings that take place in our schools are superficial and "fire fighting" attempts to solve the problems of leadership in our schools in Kenya. I will upload the whole research report after being approved and validated soon. God bless you. Ideas and suggestions are welcome.   The prefects who took part in this project please keep in touch and may God bless you.

I read A posting one social media and as much as I have agreed with what the posts and their intentions are, I disagree with the letter and the spirit of this particular one  The Qur’an and Science: Do They Agree?

Whether the Holy Qur'an and science agree is not the reason why the Muslims believe and obey the Qur'an. The Muslims are Muslims because of what they have truly experienced Spritually in their lives and if one individual finds disagreements between the Qur'an and science then that is his own opinion.  I say this because if the Qur'an was not what it claims to be, then the Muslims who still believe in would have left long time ago. All the books we call Holy scriptures have a spiritual dimension and that cannot be wished away.

The guy who found that the Qur’an and science give two very different descriptions of the earth found what he wanted to see and that does not make the Qur'an fallible or Fake. The Holy Qur'an is still Holy to the Muslims and its contributions to the shaping of mankind's history on this earth is vital and significant. All Holy Scriptures believed by the major world Religions have a spiritual dimension and they have a spiritual impact on the world;s affairs.

The Quran can never and should never be compared to the Bible to make it infallible.If the Prophet Mohamed and his followers received the revelation in whatsoever way, should not be the subject of discussion because matters of Spirituality are very personal. Personally I am christian and my personal relationship with God is through Jesus Christ and my salvation cannot be described scientifically. Does this make the Bible fallible? No not at all! Jesus walked on water-  is this true? Yes it is. Is it scientifically proven? No but the fact is, Jesus walked on water. Read on

Matthew 14:22-33

²² Immediately Jesus made the disciples get into the boat and go on ahead of him to the other side, while he dismissed the crowd. ²³ After he had dismissed them, he went up on a mountainside by himself to pray. Later that night, he was there alone, ²⁴ and the boat was already a considerable distance from land, buffeted by the waves because the wind was against it.

²⁵ Shortly before dawn Jesus went out to them, walking on the lake. ²⁶ When the disciples saw him walking on the lake, they were terrified. “It’s a ghost,” they said, and cried out in fear.
²⁷ But Jesus immediately said to them: “Take courage! It is I. Don’t be afraid.”
²⁸ “Lord, if it’s you,” Peter replied, “tell me to come to you on the water.”
²⁹ “Come,” he said.
Then Peter got down out of the boat, walked on the water and came toward Jesus. ³⁰ But when he saw the wind, he was afraid and, beginning to sink, cried out, “Lord, save me!”

³¹ Immediately Jesus reached out his hand and caught him. “You of little faith,” he said, “why did you doubt?”

The passage above has met a lot of opposition from anti-christian scientists but that does not make the bible fake nor fallible. It still remains the word of God.

When the Qur’an 2:261 reports that every ear of corn has 100 grains to me I read a figure of speech in this because even the Figurative aspect of the metaphor, simile and allegory are Semitic and have their Origin in Arabic-Hebraic traditions and folklore. The bible abounds with these sort of figures where Salomon is said to have had 700 wives and 300 concubines, this does not mean that you could take a census of Solomon's wives and confirmed that they were actually 1000, this just means they were numerous. Look at the issue of forgiving your brother like in the passage below:

²¹ Then Peter came to Jesus and asked, “Lord, how many times shall I forgive my brother or sister who sins against me? Up to seven times?”

²² Jesus answered, “I tell you, not seven times, but seventy-seven times.^[a]
23 “Therefore, the kingdom of heaven is like a king who wanted to settle accounts with his servants. ²⁴ As he began the settlement, a man who owed him ten thousand bags of gold^[b] was brought to him. ²⁵ Since he was not able to pay, the master ordered that he and his wife and his children and all that he had be sold to repay the debt.

²⁶ “At this the servant fell on his knees before him. ‘Be patient with me,’ he begged, ‘and I will pay back everything.’ ²⁷ The servant’s master took pity on him, canceled the debt and let him go.

What Jesus was teaching here was not to keep a record of how many times you forgive your brother but forgiveness is unlimited. God forgives us many times-uncountable times.

The use of figures or numbers in Hebraic and Arabic folklore cannot be tied to one mathematical meaning and cannot therefore be proven scientifically. The use of 100 fold is used also in the Bible and it does not mean just 100 but many.This cannot in anyway make the Holy Qur'an false. It should be remembered that both the Bible and the Qur'an attest to the existence of a Supreme Being who cannot be described by human words and this truth is engraved in the Christians' and Muslim's hearts and that truth and reality can NEVER be invalidated by any science or any philosophy.

Scientific accuracy of the Qur’an and whether the Qur’an is really addressing scientific issues is not an issue and is out rightly far removed and is a fallacy because Neither the Qur'an nor the Bible addresses scientific issues. Scientific issues are addressed by scientific books and science is subject to the Holy books and not the reverse. Science should be evaluated in the light of the Holy scriptures because science is fallible and based on man's discovery of what The Lord God Jehovah had created by His Word.

So I would advice all those who want to find out about what a religion stands for, do so with an open mind but tests the spirits 1John 4:1 says Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world.

Prescriptive vs Descriptive grammar
As we look at the use of language, we should specifically stick to descriptive grammar because prescriptive grammar based on a set of rules about how people especially those who think they own a language- or so called native speakers-think language should be used. In a prescriptive grammar there is right and wrong language,where the right use of language depends on the standards set by a group of individuals who feel offended when others speak a language without following the proper grammar. A good example is when a Kenyan may use a sentence like-Ng'ombe itakayoingia zizini itakamwa ( or kamuliwa) maziwa. For the users of Kiswahili, the message has already been conveyed although the sentence is grammatically wrong. The correct sentence would be Ngombe atakayeingia zizini atakamwa maziwa.

  If we say that the first sentence is wrong, because the noun ng'ombe should be in A-Wa (Ngeli)class( M-WA for the analog generation like me) we are becoming prescriptive Kiswahili grammarians and this is prejudice. For speakers whose L1( First language) is Luo or Luhya or Gikuyu, it is normal to call any animal with the neuter personal pronoun it which translates to i kiwakilishi cha nafsi  katika ngeli ya i-zi (for the analog generation we used to call this class Ngeli ya N ). We become prescriptive if we demand that the people who use a particular language as their L2( second language) should use it the way we want them to use it and according to the standards that  we have set.

However, on the other hand we should be gracious to users of a second language by encouraging communicative language use. Here is where a descriptive grammar, which is a set of rules based on how language is actually used comes in. The American rejected prescriptive grammar by writing their own Dictionary and developing their own English.

WHAT IT MEANS WHEN WE SAY ALL ARE EQUAL

Brother Faraja,

I write not as a response to the attachment but to the idea you're proposing in these line of thought that "All human beings are equal except our beliefs, tribes and thinking, which are always accidents and never the essences of our humanity. We acquire them after getting out of the wombs of our mothers".

I am responding to this particular thought because I saw that you are a colleague in the area of languages hence you must know that what we write here influences the thinking patterns of may especially those who do not take to cross check the facts.

Our beliefs.

You first statement that All Humans are Equal is correct and true but to say that our our beliefs are not equal, is a little bit dangerous because this might mean that other people's beliefs are inferior to others. In my understanding, all beliefs are equal because they are beliefs that emanate from a people's world view as a community evolves and adapts to their ways of life. A people's world view is the sum total of how they have seen life from their own perspectives as it is revealed to them by God through creation represented by nature. The American Indians, the Incas of the Amazon, the Masai of Kenya and Tanzania, the Zandawe of Tanzania and the Khoisaan of the Southern part of Africa have their beliefs that have been formed and informed by what God HAS ALLOWED THEM TO KNOW AND THESE BELIEFS ARE IN NO WAY SUPERIOR OR INFERIOR TO THOSE OF THE CIVILIZED WORLD.

Tribes

Once again I would like to point out that this word tribe carries with it very derogatory implications when used to refer to the peoples of Africa or Asia. The European scholars of sociology and Anthropology use this term to refer to those communities perceived to be uncivilized or backward. The term has no significance at all. We better use the term community, people, Ethnic community but not tribe. We know we have many communities in Africa who speak different languages and have different Cultures which give us identity, so we not tribes we are communities. My problem here first is when you say that all human beings are equal except our tribes. What do you mean here? Do you mean that all communities are Equal? What equality are you talking about here? Wealth, height,population, or what?I refer you to Okot p'Bitek's African Religions in the Western Scholarship where a whole chapter discusses this issue. I

Thinking

You need to clarify what you mean by saying that our thinking is not equal. I thought all human beings collectively taken think. As a community and a people the thinking of Africans is equal to the thinking of European but different. The European or Asian thinking is never superior to any other. I Hope what you meant here is that we do not think the same. We all think differently but our thinking is equal and that is why we have in many countries, a freedom of speech and expression entrenched in the constitution.

Which are always accidents.

the three above, beliefs, "tribe" and thinking, you incorrectly brand them "Are always accidents"as a linguist I hope you know what what you mean when you put a phrase in the present simple. How do you conclude that these are accidents? As a Christian I do not believe that it was an accident to be born in Kenyan Acts 17:26,says that From one man he made every nation of men, that they should inhabit the whole earth; and he determined the times set for them and the exact places where they should live. Read from your angle of thought, it is evident that you are happy with being born in Tanzania. You seem to feel inferior because it was by accident that you were born black or white. There are no accidents with God because nothing gives Him a surprise.

Never the essences of our humanity.

This statement is also not correct because without beliefs and thinking, I do not see the purpose of life on earth. Humanity is what it because of the same things you are abrogating.I think that the way we think, the sets of our belief systems and the Communities in which we are born make us who we are and give us the identity and existence. Please revise the statement looking at each word semantically.

Thanks.

Paul

Did St. Paul explain the Crucifixion of Jesus in his own way ?

I had responded to a posting on one social network where a Muslim Brother called Ayman had doubted the death and the ressurection of Jesus Christ and had posted to us links about some Islamic websites where a Muslim preacher was converting people to Islam.

You can watch the same videos on
1) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWuB7Llr9FQ
 2) http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xmxvd6_6-live-shahadas-with-sheikh-yusuf-estes-pierre-vogel-2-of-2_school

 Therefore Rashid,asked me question in the following email:

Ndugu Paul
It is 'dialogue' not 'clash'. It is to meet the Islamic preacher online, just go ahead.
Let there be no compulsion in Religion:
For the truth stands out dinstinct from error.
-Holy Quran 2:256 -----------------....BUT MOST OF THE MANKIND STILL DO NOT KNOW (HOLY QURAN 12:40).------------
NDUGU PAUL , Iam a Layman and not a specialist, May i learn from you.Just an inquiry, Is it true that St. Paul explained the Crucifixion of Jesus (Isa) in his own way ? Ali On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 9:48 AM 

So the following is my responce to Rashid about what I observed in the Video and the question on Paul's Ministry.

Just as I said to Ayman, please pay attention to how English is used here because a lot is lost when you focus on non-essentilas or you lose the focus of a communication. Please let me clarify:

1. By compulsion, I did not mean that the man was compelled to become a muslim. What I said was, THE MAN WAS COMPELLED TO SWEAR. Is this not compulsion? Gabriel did choose what to say, he was led to swear this is compulsion and when you make someone swear in disregard of the person's volition, that is making a vow under duress. You realize that at a point, he couldn't repeat exactly what he was  told to say- rasoosoolulah he said bismilahi- this is clear evidence that the man was not himself-i.e he was not thinking straight. Whatever happened to this guy can happen to anyone especially in a high powered congregation such as that one. Many people are overwhelmed by emotions when the cameras are directed at them.

2. Please could respond to the Issue of swearing in people to make a decision? In Christianity from which you Muslims model almost all your evangelisation including public rallies- when we lead anyone to Christ Jesus, we ask them to pray and invite Jesus in their lives and we never ask the person to swear. Please I would like you to comment on this. For those who are reading this, I would like to point out that Islam as super religion-the best among the best of religions- is LEGALISTIC TO THE CORE and there is no ounce of GRACE. Grace is undeserved favour granted to a sinner from God through Jesus Christ.

3. Did you realize that the guy replicated exactly what he used to know when he was a christian? Could you please point to me in the Quran where an individual's sins are forgiven at reciting the shahada? Who forgives these sins? What sins was Gabriel being forgiven? How did the preacher come to a conclusion that Gabriel was a sinner? Did Gabriel confess to be a sinner? Please I would like these questions answered.

You made an inquiry, as to whether it was true that St. Paul explained the Crucifixion of Jesus (Isa) in his own way, My answer to this question is yes and No.

1.First, yes because Paul was an apostle of Jesus Christ who met the resurrected Jesus on his way to Damascus to persecute the Christians. He was a Pharisee himself knowledgeable in matters of the Law and Religion per-excellence! So when he wrote about the death of Jesus, he was speaking and writing about what he had witnessed with his own eyes. Paul Himself may not have met Jesus Christ while Jesus was alive because many of the religious leaders sought to see him but they couldn't.Even those who went to arrest Jesus did not know him and sought the services of Judas Iscariot to show them and that is why he told those going to arrest Jesus that the one I kiss is him Mathew 26 

⁴⁷ While He was still speaking, behold, Judas, one of the twelve, came up ^[l]accompanied by a large crowd with swords and clubs, who came from the chief priests and elders of the people. ⁴⁸ Now he who was betraying Him gave them a sign, saying, “Whomever I kiss, He is the one; seize Him.” ⁴⁹ Immediately Judas went to Jesus and said, “Hail, Rabbi!” and kissed Him. ⁵⁰ And Jesus said to him, “Friend, do what you have come for.” Then they came and laid hands on Jesus and seized Him.

The above passage shows that Paul was just the same as these guys here who did not who know who Jesus was. Another person was Herod the King who sought to see him but could not. Here Jesus himself points to the same fact I am positing above that many did not know him and could not identify who He was because he was not as famous as Prophet Mohammad. He lived among the poor, his company was ex-fishermen, tax collectors and all people who lived on the peripheries of society. How could he meet a mad man living in the grave yard if he didn't visit those areas? How could he meet lepers when lepers were excluded and isolated from the public?

⁵⁵ At that time Jesus said to the crowds, “Have you come out with swords and clubs to arrest Me as you would against a robber? Every day I used to sit in the temple teaching and you did not seize Me. ⁵⁶ But all this has taken place to fulfill the Scriptures of the prophets.” Then all the disciples left Him and fled.

For example, I know Uhuru Kenyatta  but I have never met him in person.  Just because I have never met Uhuru Kenyatta in person does not deny me the right of talking and even writing about him especially if I can find what he says recorded anywhere.

Secondly, the second part of the answer to your question above is NO because Paul wrote about the death of Jesus Christ basing his writing on the Scriptures as he and other Jewish believer knew.

Lastly remember, the Islamic believer in the video said Jesus told his disciples to buy a sword. Now let me say again here, you Muslim brothers do us a great disservice when you pull out the scriptures out of context and you wrongly interpret them the same way you interpret the Quran. The Bible is not a book of holy verses. It is a library of Books written by human beings who were sinners but inspired by God to write what they did. Your Holy Quran just fell down in caves to Prophet Mohammad while he was alone hence the revelation becomes subjective. Only Prophet Mohammed knows the source of the Quran and no other human being was there to share this wonderful revelation. In Chritianity, the Bible was written by diverse people in different cultures, from different backgrounds over a long period of time. Neverthe less the Bible talks about the same God, the same Holy Spirit, the same Jesus and the same story.

Now look at what that scripture says about the sword;

¹ “Simon, Simon, behold, Satan has ^[d]demanded permission to sift you like wheat; ³² but I have prayed for you, that your faith may not fail; and you, when once you have turned again, strengthen your brothers.” ³³ But he said to Him, “Lord, with You I am ready to go both to prison and to death!” ³⁴ And He said, “I say to you, Peter, the rooster will not crow today until you have denied three times that you know Me.”

³⁵ And He said to them, “When I sent you out without money belt and bag and sandals, you did not lack anything, did you?” They said, “No, nothing.” ³⁶ And He said to them, “But now, ^[e]whoever has a money belt is to take it along, likewise also a bag, and ^[f]whoever has no sword is to sell his ^[g]coat and buy one. ³⁷ For I tell you that this which is written must be fulfilled in Me, ‘And He was numbered with transgressors’; for that which refers to Me has its ^[h]fulfillment.” ³⁸ They said, “Lord, look, here are two swords.” And He said to them, “It is enough.

Why was Jesus telling his disciples to do this? Was he commanding them to take swords and use them to kill?. Was he asking them to defend him using swords? The answers to my questions above are NO. Why? Jesus was preparing His disciples for the next phase of life without him. He knew he was going to be killed and he was telling his Disciples that while he was with them that He provided for them while he was with them but when he dies, they will need to fend for themselves. The disciples of Jesus were just human beings who were also insecure and Jesus had protected them against many things including drowning in the sea of Galilee. Now according to the above scripture, Jesus was fulfilling the prophesies as HE HIMSELF QUOTES verse 37 above. Now let us see what Christ intended to teach His disciples about the sword. Read

⁵¹ And behold, one of those who were with Jesus ^[m]reached and drew out his sword, and struck the slave of the high priest and ^[n]cut off his ear. ⁵² Then Jesus *said to him, “Put your sword back into its place; for all those who take up the sword shall perish by the sword. ⁵³ Or do you think that I cannot appeal to My Father, and He will at once put at My disposal more than twelve ^[o]legions of angels? ⁵⁴ How then will the Scriptures be fulfilled, which say that it must happen this way?”

The Lord Jesus did not ask His disciple to buy swords and use them to kill. He actually wanted to teach them that it is not by their power; "Not by might nor by power, but by My Spirit,’ says the Lord of hosts. ⁷ ‘What are you, O great mountain? Before Zerubbabel you will become a plain; and he will bring forth the top stone with shouts of “Grace, grace to it!”’” And in Psalm 44:3 we are told that not by the sword but by God's Spirit. It was not by their sword that they won the land, nor did their arm bring them victory; it was your right hand, your arm, and the light of your face, for you loved them.

I am not among the People who believe that Islam was spread by the sword that is a great lie and it is also folly for this guy to say that this is what we Christians teach.

I hope I have comprehensively answered your question.

Paul