Sunday, November 13, 2011

We do not worship the same God

Dear Bro Rashid,
Thanks for your response although you got mixed up a bit.I responded to all your posting one by one. I never left any issue you raised unanswered. Please let me make myself clear here. Rashid when I read your posts, I read everything critically and with an open mind. First our bone of contention ( not a quarrel or a disagreement but a debate) was whether Christians and Muslims worship the same God and Whether the Jesus of Islam is the same Jesus of the Bible. My posit on these two issues was that Muslims worship the God of the Quran who does not appear anywhere in the Bible and the Jesus of Islam, is a Jesus who escaped death and instead an individual was crucified in his place. Rashid these issues must be looked at from these two points of view or else we shall circumlocute and our efforts will be futile. 

I never ignored any issue you raised if I did so please remind me. I also gave you a link to my blog so please any issue that I may have left out is in my blog. I do not like talking about my academic background. I do no know why you could not tell from writing that I am not just a joy rider. I am a Christian by conviction first, a theologian, and an educator. Surely Rashid you can not refer me to any scholar because what I talk about, I quote directly from the bible, you have not responded to a single of those quotes neither have you refuted their claim. In my responses to your postings I have never quoted from any Bible commentary.

Why do you tell me to check with an A level graduate? Sincerely, do you feel that I come out as one who is so ignorant of what I am talking about just because I do want agree with what you are saying? I have not doubted your understanding of the Quran and the Islamic religion, why do you doubt mine? For the sake of may be making you know me I will give you my educational background. I went to school in Eldoret, From standard one in 1971 -1978 when I did my C.P.E Joined High School and sat for A-levels in 1989 scored three principles. CRE was one of the Subjects I studied. I am a candidate of a PhD in Educational Leadership Curriculum and Instruction, a holder of an earned Master of Education degree (M.ED) Assumption University, a Master of Philosophy (MPhil.) Moi University, Post Graduate Diploma in Education (P.G.D.E) Maseno University, and Bachelor of Theology(Bth) from Scott Theological College. So when we debate please know that I am an a scholar in my own right.
 
Now matters concerning the Roman Catholic Church, it is me to tell you what the term catholic means and not you. You said in your posting that it is Paul who founded the Roman Catholic Church or the Catholic Church is based on the theology and teachings of Paul. I told that this was not so because the Origin of the Christian Church in Rome as the Capital of the Roman Empire, was not founded by any Apostle of the twelve. I have a whole paper on this topic. When you say that Pauline theology is the basis of the Catholic Church I told you that that was a fallacy because you speaking from what you were 'mistaught' by whoever. You never had any tangible evidence from the Bible to claim this assertion. You never gave any reference from any Catholic Author supporting your allegation.

Now I will delve in the issues you raised but pointing out at the onset that all you sadi here below is hearsay because it is not scholarly. No evidence and everything is cut and paste from Christian haters. 
Is there any connection between the Jesus and the Church today, if you remove St. Paul from the equation?
If you remove St. Paul and his teachings on the “risen Christ”, then the Christian Church will have no legs to stand on. Why?:

Rashid this is not a rhetorical Question as you called it, a rhetorical question is a question that is asked in order to make a statement and which does not expect an answer. Your question demands an answer. And the answer is, yes there is a great connection between Jesus Christ (the Messiah) and the Christian Church because Jesus Christ Himself said John 17

13 “I am coming to you now, but I say these things while I am still in the world, so that they may have the full measure of my joy within them. 14 I have given them your word and the world has hated them, for they are not of the world any more than I am of the world. 15My prayer is not that you take them out of the world but that you protect them from the evil one. 16 They are not of the world, even as I am not of it. 17 Sanctify them by[d] the truth; your word is truth. 18 As you sent me into the world, I have sent them into the world. 19 For them I sanctify myself, that they too may be truly sanctified.
Jesus Prays for All Believers
    20 “My prayer is not for them alone. I pray also for those who will believe in me through their message, 21 that all of them may be one, Father, just as you are in me and I am in you. May they also be in us so that the world may believe that you have sent me. 22 I have given them the glory that you gave me, that they may be one as we are one— 23 I in them and you in me—so that they may be brought to complete unity. Then the world will know that you sent me and have loved them even as you have loved me.
   24 “Father, I want those you have given me to be with me where I am, and to see my glory, the glory you have given me because you loved me before the creation of the world.
   25 “Righteous Father, though the world does not know you, I know you, and they know that you have sent me. 26 I have made you[e] known to them, and will continue to make you known in order that the love you have for me may be in them and that I myself may be in them.”


The above quote from the Gospel of John who was the youngest disciple of Jesus, is Jesus' prayer for the believers the world over. And in Mathew 28 Jesus Sends them to the entire world starting from Jerusalem to Judea and to the end of the world.This is a connection between Jesus Of the Bible and the Christians.

You said,
     Jesus himself claimed he was sent unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel (and not to the Gentiles);


When Jesus said this He was referring to his role as the Mesiah. His duty was to prepare Apostles to reach the lost sheep of Israel. After the Israelites, the next phase of His mission was to the Gentiles and this He did through Peter first who preached to Cornelius and later through Paul. Paul is the Apostle to the Gentile I gave a whole passage From Acts 13 detailing to you that the Gentile Church which is not required to follow the Jewish religion was launched. The person given this mandate was Paul. The reason you Muslims do not find peace with Paul's writings is because He is the only apostle who has written much of what we call the New Testament. I have never tried to detach myself from Paul because he says Romans 15

 7 Accept one another, then, just as Christ accepted you, in order to bring praise to God. 8For I tell you that Christ has become a servant of the Jews[b] on behalf of God’s truth, so that the promises made to the patriarchs might be confirmed 9 and, moreover, that the Gentiles might glorify God for his mercy. As it is written:
   “Therefore I will praise you among the Gentiles;
   I will sing the praises of your name.”[c]
 10 Again, it says,
   “Rejoice, you Gentiles, with his people.”[d]
 11 And again,
   “Praise the Lord, all you Gentiles;
   let all the peoples extol him.”[e]
 12 And again, Isaiah says,
   “The Root of Jesse will spring up,
   one who will arise to rule over the nations;
   in him the Gentiles will hope.”[f]
 13 May the God of hope fill you with all joy and peace as you trust in him, so that you may overflow with hope by the power of the Holy Spirit.
Paul the Minister to the Gentiles
 14 I myself am convinced, my brothers and sisters, that you yourselves are full of goodness, filled with knowledge and competent to instruct one another. 15 Yet I have written you quite boldly on some points to remind you of them again, because of the grace God gave me 16 to be a minister of Christ Jesus to the Gentiles. He gave me the priestly duty of proclaiming the gospel of God, so that the Gentiles might become an offering acceptable to God, sanctified by the Holy Spirit.

All that Paul is saying here is as He quotes from the First Testament as he knew it. There is no single Christian who can deny that Paul. We believe in all he said and wrote. What he wrote he received from God and if you do not believe that Paul was an Apostle God then please just keep to your faith and let us Christian hold on to what we know and believe. In the first place, you claim that the Four gopels were written by eye witnesses and the bible being full of mistakes yet you stick to the verses that say Jesus came only for the Jews. Why can you let us interpret for you what we understand by what Paul says? 

Lastly on this issue of Connection between Jesus and The Church now, I would like to draw  your attention to the fact that the bible says what it says and it never contradicts itself. This I say because you do not know why Jesus chose 12 disciples, 72 apostles and send them to the lost sheep of Israel. There were 12 tribes and gentiles are not part of these 12 so the need of having Paul as an apostle to the Gentiles.

I will repond to the remaining part later.
Paul

2 comments:

  1. The oneness of God is very clearly stated in the holy Quran in so many places and infact the following verse not only does it state the oneness of God but refutes trinity.

    Allah says in the Holy Quran:

    "O people of the Scripture (Christians)! Do not exceed the limits in your religion, nor say of Allah aught but the truth. The Messiah 'Îsa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary), was (no more than) a Messenger of Allah and His Word, ("Be!" - and he was) which He bestowed on Maryam (Mary) and a spirit (Ruh ) created by Him; so believe in Allah and His Messengers. Say not: "Three (trinity)!" Cease! (it is) better for you. For Allah is (the only) One Ilah (God), glory be to Him (Far Exalted is He) above having a son. To Him belongs all that is in the heavens and all that is in the earth. And Allah is All-Sufficient as a Disposer of affairs. "
    ( An-Nisa, Chapter 4, Verse 171)

    Further to the description of the pronoun 'We' provided earlier by bros Abu Ayman & Rashid ,
    Allaah, may He be glorified and exalted, sometimes refers to Himself in the singular, by name or by use of a pronoun, and sometimes by use of the plural, as in the phrase : ‘Verily, We have given you a manifest victory” [al-Fath 48:1], and other similar phrases. But Allaah never refers to Himself by use of the dual, because the plural refers to the respect that He deserves, and may refer to His names and attributes, whereas the dual refers to a specific number (and nothing else), and He is far above that.”
    These words, innaa (“Verily We”) and nahnu (“We”), and other forms of the plural, may be used by one person speaking on behalf of a group, or they may be used by one person for purposes of respect or glorification, as is done by some monarchs when they issue statements or decrees in which they say “We have decided…” etc. [This is known in English as “The Royal We” – Translator]. In such cases, only one person is speaking but the plural is used for respect. The One Who is more deserving of respect than any other is Allaah, may He be glorified and exalted, so when He says in the Qur’an innaa (“Verily We”) and nahnu (“We”), it is for respect and glorification, not to indicate plurality of numbers. If an aayah of this type is causing confusion, it is essential to refer to the clear, unambiguous aayaat for clarification, and if a Christian like you Paul, for example, insists on taking ayaat such as “Verily, We: it is We Who have sent down the Dhikr (i.e., the Qur’an)” [al-Hijr 15:9 – interpretation of the meaning] as proof of divine plurality, we refute this claim by quoting such clear and unambiguous aayaat as (interpretation of the meanings): “And your god is One God, there is none who has the right to be worshipped but He, the Most Beneficent, the Most Merciful” [al-Baqarah 2:163] and “Say: He is Allaah, the One” [al-Ikhlaas 112:1] – and other aayaat which can only be interpreted in one way. Thus confusion will be dispelled for the one who is seeking the truth. Every time Allaah uses the plural to refer to Himself, it is based on the respect and honour that He deserves, and on the great number of His names and attributes, and on the great number of His troops and angels.” (Reference: Al-‘Aqeedah al-Tadmuriyyah by Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah, p. 109). And Allaah knows best.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Marwa, with due respect, your asigning of the WE pronoun to the respect God deserves does not hold any water because it is your own interpretation as you try to eisegete the quran. If you let the Bible speak for itself, you will see what we are seeing. We does not just represent DUALITY infact in Endlish two was not a plural. When we talk of the triune God we do not refer to him as plural because He is ONE. The word triune is singular. There is ONE in Three persons. This is an issue you will never understand because you cannot understand your creator. God is unfathormable.
      God is one. When you say that "Every time Allaah uses the plural to refer to Himself, it is based on the respect and honour that He deserves, and on the great number of His names and attributes, and on the great number of His troops and angels." where do you get this from? If God can use WE just to respect Himself,then is He really God? Who in real life among us humans can refer to himself as "WE"? Indeed as you have said in this words here that the WE may refer to'the great number of His names and attributes, and on the great number of His troops and angels. Why can't this also refer to the trinity? Why do you accept it to refer to Angels and not to His Son Jesus Christ who has name that is above all names?

      Infact, it is Our God Yahweh who is triune. You Muslim have your Own God called Allah and He is not the same with the God we worship the Father of Jesus Christ. The Bible was before the Quran, Chritianity comes before Islam, Jesus came before Prophet Muhamad. Why do you want to force your own interpretation of what we believe our God to be?

      Delete